In a legal twist that has sent shockwaves through the music industry, Drake has filed a defamation lawsuit against Universal Music Group (UMG) over Kendrick Lamar’s controversial diss track, “Not Like Us.” The suit, submitted on January 15, 2025, in New York federal court, accuses the music conglomerate of defamation, harassment, and employing unlawful tactics to profit from the track while tarnishing Drake’s reputation.
The Allegations
At the heart of Drake’s complaint is the claim that UMG, which oversees the record labels of both the Toronto star and Kendrick Lamar, orchestrated a calculated campaign to make “Not Like Us” a global sensation. The lawsuit alleges that UMG “approved, published, and launched” the song with the intent of generating viral attention and financial success. However, Drake asserts that this came at a severe personal cost to him.
The Scorpion rapper alleges that the song falsely brands him as a pedophile and advocates violence against him, resulting in an “avalanche of online hate speech.” The lawsuit also claims UMG engaged in dubious promotional practices, such as purchasing fake streams and radio play, to bolster the track’s popularity. According to Drake, these actions were part of a broader strategy to devalue his brand and gain leverage in future contract negotiations.
“UMG anticipated that extending Drake’s contract would be costly,” the filing reads. “By devaluing Drake’s music and brand, UMG would gain leverage to force Drake to sign a new deal on terms more favorable to UMG.”
Real-World Consequences
Drake’s legal team detailed the tangible harm he has faced since the release of “Not Like Us.” The lawsuit highlights a shooting at his Toronto residence shortly after the song dropped, during which a security guard was injured. Additionally, Drake has endured multiple incidents of trespassing and has taken significant steps to protect his family. His son was withdrawn from elementary school, and his family temporarily relocated for safety reasons.
The rapper described an ongoing pattern of “violence and vitriol” that has left him deeply concerned for his safety and that of his loved ones. The filing accuses UMG of turning a blind eye to the fallout, despite Drake confronting the company about the harm he has endured.
A Legal Battle Unlike Any Other
While legal disputes in the music industry are not uncommon, Drake’s lawsuit is notable for its focus on UMG rather than Kendrick Lamar, the artist behind the diss track. In the filing, Drake emphasizes that his issue is not with Kendrick but with the company that chose to publish and monetize what he claims are baseless and dangerous accusations.
“This lawsuit is not about the artist who created ‘Not Like Us.’ It is, instead, entirely about UMG, the music company that decided to publish, promote, exploit, and monetize allegations that it understood were not only false but dangerous,” the lawsuit states.
The suit also references a prior pre-action petition Drake filed in November, which sought information about UMG’s alleged use of streaming bots and payola. Although UMG and Spotify have denied any wrongdoing, the petition laid the groundwork for the current legal battle. A similar petition against UMG and iHeartMedia is still pending, with a court hearing scheduled later this month.
Industry Reactions
The lawsuit has sparked intense debate within the music and hip-hop communities. Critics have questioned Drake’s decision to involve the courts in what some perceive as a rap beef, while others commend him for addressing systemic issues within the music industry. Notably, this legal clash sheds light on practices like fake streams and payola, which have long been whispered about but rarely confronted so publicly.
The stakes are high for both parties. For UMG, the lawsuit could lead to significant reputational and financial repercussions if the allegations are proven. For Drake, the legal battle is a fight to protect his legacy and reputation.
The Road Ahead
UMG has yet to issue a formal response to the lawsuit, but the outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for the music industry. As the legal proceedings unfold, they will likely fuel broader conversations about artist rights, label practices, and the ethics of promotional strategies in the digital age.
For now, all eyes are on the courtroom as the 6 God seeks justice in what may be one of the most consequential legal battles in recent hip-hop history.